![]() |
|||
Attachment, Trust & The Learned Emotions A crucial understanding for anyone taking on the parental challenge is to recognize that without adequate emotional development, certain feelings will never fully arise. Complex emotional signals are learned and must be purposefully and carefully instilled. Recall that the primary emotions of spirit, (i.e. joy, fear, anger, and sadness) combine and mingle with the local customs and beliefs to develop the learned emotions of mind. The emotions of mind include all other subtle shades of emotional feeling (i.e. guilt, confidence, hope, envy, pride, shame, remorse, etc.) These feeling signals are learned through experiential interactions with the world. This speaks to the idea of getting married and becoming a parent at an age when full control of the emotional qualities has not yet been mastered. What is taught to the child, especially at an early age, is most often that which is best remembered. The emotions of mind come quite naturally when the child's needs are accommodated, so there is no huge task involved other than setting up the proper conditions. The conditions mentioned above are optimal, but in any environment where there is reasonable freedom, need-meeting opportunity, and exposure to ideas, these emotions will arise. This is why so many humans with widely varying cultural traditions have successfully learned these feelings despite the many obstacles. When two people from differing cultural backgrounds come together to
rear a child, that child is being exposed to what can and should be the best of both "worlds", providing the parents are intent on passing on the best their respective cultures have to offer.
Parenting is probably our least taught skill. Because of the propensity to emphasize the diversity in our religious and philosophical views on morality and because of the false pride taken in those beliefs, a defined base line of child rearing is most difficult to arrive at. Yet, were the intent to be shifted to what is best for the child versus what is important to the parent, much progress could be made in this area. The critical concept here is trust. It shouldn't seem unreasonable for an infant to expect to be able to trust the words and actions of those in the family home or foster community, nor for loving parents or caregivers to consistently deliver. The dependent nature of humans upon one another is the Divine way. Trust is the understanding and faith in the cooperative nature of the world. This is why without a cooperative, trustworthy early environment, the spirit will simply vacate the body. Those that are born to chaotic worlds where a minimum level of cooperation does not exist, will die. Those that are not fed will starve. Those that are not handled, loved and stimulated will fail to thrive and die of loneliness. Those who must constantly compete for basic survival will lose to the "fittest" competitor. It is said that "death finds an excuse". Sometimes those "excuses" are of a subtle, emotional nature, which we humans are yet to fully
understand and appreciate.
Here, again, parents are prone to repeat the patterns of behavior they were subjected to as children. Those who have conducted themselves in less than enlightened ways during the child rearing period of their lives can only know
regret. However, if they can impart this information on to those who are about to, or are now involved in child rearing, recompense can be made. In a society that thrives on mistrust, insecurity and fear, this conditioned lack of trust is most difficult to overcome.
However, if the society can realize the value of altering itself to the benefit of those who threaten it the most, positive change can evolve. Trust in family, trust in businesses, trust in government
are all essential to a well functioning society; and behind all of this "trust" must ultimately be truth. The rule should be obvious. Early experience in attachment leads to lifelong attachment, so long as a parent makes himself/herself
available in times of need. The trick is to maintain the love while giving up the control. The difference between contrived guilt and natural guilt is in whether the source of the guilt is
self-created or imposed upon us from an outside source. Guilt can be used as a weapon by one person against another, as well as a method of control. But positive guilt is that which comes from within and is in triggered through
empathy with those whom we have offended. With the above paragraph in mind, we might want to give some closer reflection to the competitive system in which we live. If cooperation creates trust and distrust creates anger (and violence), would we, as a society, not benefit by encouraging the former and reducing the latter? Just as competition will be the main motivator in such cases, the predominant feeling will be anger. The anger can be expressed in one of two directions. The child can turn it inward toward himself, by choosing to accept the limitations of the world, effacing the spirit and losing touch with his needs. Strategies of self-deprecation, learned helplessness, martyrdom, and self-hatred can become enduring personality traits. Such a choice can lead to an ultimate state of depression or even dissociation and the dependence upon escapism from the ongoing spiritual pain. Compulsions, addictions and self-destructive behaviors can then occur. Suicide is the ultimate act of internally directed anger. The road between internally directed anger and ultimate self-destruction is usually long enough for most people to observe and correct it. Understanding the source of this
anger is a first step in that process of correction. Each time a violent act (such as murder) is committed, society feels obliged to stifle it's own freedom of expression. Eventually, the decision to substitute total security for any
degree of freedom will lead to tyranny. Examining the roots of aggressive anger can help us to understand and avoid a destiny of spiritual decadence. In the past, welfare regulations established an environment that penalized recipients who allowed a parent (usually the father) to occupy the same
household, while rewarding the other parent (the mother) for having more children. This often reduced the time the mother could devote to each child, while being deprived of the assistance of the other parent. The consequences of
this "state" are coming increasing evident as we continue to construct more prisons. It may turn out that the best environment for correcting this wayward course of life, lies in the prisons we continue to place these alienated people in,
and the best people to help with this correction are those who are, themselves, the inhabitants. The act of simply loading down a child with every stimulating toy the child asks for or the parent is motivated to buy, can result in the opposite result as that which is intended. There are times when parents have to say "No", for the sake of their children and their own pocketbooks. In this case, other kinds of emotional problems will result. Such unrealistic expectations can become firmly rooted maladaptive beliefs which also generate feelings of anger. This would be the case of the "spoiled brat" who lashes out in tantrums against a world that is not immediately accommodating all whims and wants. Indulgent conditions can instill false pride, vanity, envy, and hubris. Such a child has developed a very unrealistic view of the world, which may set them up for a big fall in other, more challenging or dangerous environments. There is a difference between unlimited freedom to have everything one wants and intelligent expression of desires. The former leads to eventual self-destruction. The latter leads to growth and fulfillment. Essentially, parents could achieve a balance by providing opportunity to accommodate all human needs, and offering the tools to the child to develop skills to attain his or her wants. With age, the children should be increasingly responsible to meet their needs themselves. Genuine pride and esteem are the natural rewards for such developmental successes. This is the positive guideline which, in the end, contributes to the benefit of society, as a whole.
Cultural Manipulation of The Emotional System The latter example calls attention
to the fact that culture can taint feeling. It is crucial also for parents to understand how the emotional system can become entangled with the local values, truths, and activities of the culture. All emotions---even the emotions
of spirit---can be affected and elicited simply by the contents of mind.
(Remember, feelings help the mind to learn. Any cultural truth will work unless it violates a natural one or conflicts with another). This is why the rules of response require looking first to mind before looking to the outside world for needed changes.
Dogmas of religion, for example, that tend to put limitations upon free will, are able to slip in as slivers when the established content of
our beliefs is completely turned over to the outside world. This is known as blind faith and once control is accepted by one institution (such as religion), other institutions (such as government) will move to taken advantage of the easily controllable. Making this shift of behavior will require most humans in parental roles to move beyond the beliefs they were taught by their own parents and make that paradigm leap to a new level of understanding. The whole process of doing this has been outlined earlier and the motivation, if not previously explained to sufficiency, will most certainly follow.
A Word About Guilt This is the emotion of
guilt. It is a common practice in many, if not all, social systems to set behavioral rules and codes to which a member must conform. A connected and healthy individual will then experience guilt if their actions do not conform to
the rules. So we can conclude by the above, that "guilt" is an essential quality of a society that imposes its rules of behavior upon its members. This, of course, is guidance from a source outside of ourselves. Once we are able to shift to internal guidance, guilt should go the way of error. Guilt is intended to help the mind find conflicting beliefs that go against the needs and workings of spirit. It is intended to point out where the action choices have not aligned with the beliefs and values. It is intended to be used to elevate the needs of spirit above the unnecessary limits of local tradition. Guilt is not necessarily indicative of an active conscience. People can learn to attach guilt to virtually any activity judged to be unacceptable by their local society. Guilt often exposes an inner motivator that is simply more powerful than the external controller. The intended message of guilt is to straighten out the priorities and to drop any rules that are limiting to the needs of spirit---often exactly the opposite of its culturally implied meaning. The difference between what "guilt" is intended to do and what it ultimately results in, is evidence of what can go wrong when such an emotion is
placed in the hands of those more enamored with power than spiritual development. But when in place as an internal guide, it can alert a person to the spiritual impropriety of adopted rules and practices. Had German citizens been
listening to their inner guidance, the holocaust might have been prevented.
Sometimes, even nationalism, when robbed of the institutional rules that guarantee the responsible exercise of free will, will become akin to pseudo-religion. Governments
than lay "guilt trips" upon citizens who decline to support a particular policy, i.e. an immoral war. To
greater or lesser degrees, this condition exists in most, so called, civilized societies today. In societies where "feminine shame" did not exist, westerners sent missionaries to establish it. The puritan influence present in the establishment of the country is still firmly in place, to the point of invoking punishment upon those whose conduct strays beyond the legal boundaries of proper sexual mores and choices, even into the privacy of one's own bedroom. The bottom line is that most guilt and shame is unnecessary. Parents must pay particular attention to guard against the perpetuation of any cultural directive that pits the mind against the needs and purposes of body and spirit. The only durable cultural truths are those that allow all purposes to work together. A child should be made aware of the Divine nature of the body, its processes, and its needs, and never to feel guilt or shame over the physical form. Any such cultural assumptions should be soundly rejected. (This goes for any and every religious dictate that instills guilt over any naturally ordained Divine process. Any such assertion defies the intention of the Creator it claims to serve). Struggling out of an established environment of decadent practices will likely result in pitting one generation against another, as those freeing themselves from burdens such as "guilt" will also move beyond the institutions that have for so long used such methods of control. And finally, parents must resist the temptation to utilize guilt as a mechanism of control. Such a strategy is not only doomed to failure, but it perpetuates needless pain. Mechanisms of external social control are not necessary when the social system has been designed according to the voice of spirit. Forgiveness is the key in learning situations. Errors signal opportunity to learn. Any actions of the child which elicit feelings of remorse should be interpreted as those of spirit asking for integrity, accountability, and consistency between thought and action. Parental faith, compassion, and forgiveness allow any missteps to be kept in proper perspective and the child to use this information to further develop the mind. A child raised with the best of guidelines listed above, will naturally gravitate toward an environment where the consequential qualities will blossom and have a positive effect on the world around him/her. Such a parental approach will foster the faith, compassion and forgiveness of self that are necessary for any human to thrive and creatively express self in the chaotic world of daily trial and error learning. Indeed, it will be those who reconnect with spirit and follow its urgings who will change the very world. Thus, it is essential for each enlightened one to ensure the enlightened perspective is carried forth throughout subsequent generations. Therefore, the paternal role in inculcation is a particularly important one. For those of us who are beyond the parental stage in life, it behooves us to recognize the spiritual value of what has been conveyed in these Lessons and be
prepared to share the information when an opportunity presents itself, as it surely will.
|
|||
| [Lessons of Enlightenment] [Preface] [Alpha 1] [Alpha 2] [Alpha 3] [Alpha 4] [Beta 1a] [Beta 2a] [Beta 3] [Beta 4] [Gamma 1] [Gamma 2A] [Gamma 2B] [Gamma 3A] [Gamma 3B] [Gamma 4A] [Gamma 4B] [Delta 1] [Delta 2] [Delta 3] [Epsilon 1] [Epsilon 2] [Epsilon 3] [Zeta 1] [Zeta 2A] [Zeta 2B] [Zeta 3] [Eta 1] [Eta 2] [Eta 3] [Theta 1] [Theta 2] [Theta 3A] [Theta 3B] [Omega] [Links] [Readers' Contributions] |